Windows XP is your problem. QBASIC and Windows XP don't mix. You have either one of two solutions. a) Use pure DOS or b) Use a different compiler than QBASIC. Most people on the forum will point you to FreeBASIC.
Moderators: Wrong forum.
Search found 394 matches
- Thu Oct 12, 2006 4:05 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Suddenly very slow to open files!!
- Replies: 11
- Views: 26034
- Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:37 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Searching help.
- Replies: 22
- Views: 29635
One thing I was wondering. Is it possible to put a loop inside another loop? Yes, loops inside of loops are totally legal. FOR A=1 TO 24 FOR B=1 TO 80 PRINT A,B SLEEP NEXT B NEXT A What the code does (visual representation!) Start A loop Start B loop Print A,B Increment B(+1) Is B finally 80? If no...
- Thu Oct 12, 2006 3:27 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: Computer acronyms
- Replies: 9
- Views: 17057
- Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:15 am
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Searching help.
- Replies: 22
- Views: 29635
- Wed Oct 11, 2006 8:10 am
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Searching help.
- Replies: 22
- Views: 29635
- Fri Oct 06, 2006 4:22 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Sub Script out of range
- Replies: 12
- Views: 17813
- Thu Oct 05, 2006 7:55 am
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: saving
- Replies: 3
- Views: 6673
- Tue Oct 03, 2006 8:23 am
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: brt71efr.lib missing
- Replies: 12
- Views: 25509
I'm sorry I can't be of more help, but it seems you are missing either... a) The switch to make it a stand-alone executable OR b) The BC7.1 Runtime Module. To fix A, use the switch for stand alone executables. To fix B, do the same thing you did for that library, except for brt71efr.ex~ ------------...
- Thu Sep 21, 2006 3:52 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: convert graphic screen to e.g. JPG file
- Replies: 8
- Views: 13402
- Wed Sep 20, 2006 8:20 am
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: are you prepared for emergencies with a kit?
- Replies: 32
- Views: 63395
- Fri Sep 15, 2006 4:13 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: TI-BASIC program - Need suggestions.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 46615
He means they don't run as fast. I've done many transfers from my 84+ SE and 83+/83+SE. CrunchyOS for the wind!!! Mirage OS leaks RAM. Yes, they're not as fast. The TI-84+ has some features that 83s don't, particularly times (because the 84+ has a clock) CrunchyOS also runs BASIC programs slower th...
- Wed Sep 13, 2006 5:04 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: TI-BASIC program - Need suggestions.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 46615
Aight, here we go, 84+ n00b... I also noticed that the scrolling on the APPS menu is MUCH slower than on the 83+/84+. 2 solutions: Since the 84SE comes with a ton of apps, erase the ones you'll never use. Download OMNICALC from Detached Soultions and activate the Fast App Menu option. It's LIGHTNING...
- Tue Sep 12, 2006 4:10 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: TI-BASIC program - Need suggestions.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 46615
- Mon Sep 11, 2006 5:00 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: BPTB
- Replies: 0
- Views: 11736
BPTB
Can someone name off some experiences with BPTB? I'm thinking about implementing it into TRADE (my TUI - Text Replaces All Display Easily)
- Mon Sep 11, 2006 4:53 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: TI-BASIC program - Need suggestions.
- Replies: 25
- Views: 46615
Re: TI-BASIC program - Need suggestions.
I feel like an idiot. To group 800 the old program took 32 hours. See how mine's better? New: 3 hours Old: 32 hours Newest: 80 seconds (thats roughly 1500x faster than the old, and 135x faster than the 'new' NEW SOURCE: (It's also got a smaler file size! I feel sooo accomplished!) Input A {0}> L GRO...
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:13 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: I'm having a bit of a problem
- Replies: 14
- Views: 24122
- Tue Aug 29, 2006 4:11 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Pointers, PEEKing, and POKEing
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10245
Cons: I dont know how to use them. Pros: There is an entry in the help file. How useful. No, really, I'm not being sarcastic, I'm sure this is exactly the kind of reply Patz was looking for, keep up the amazing work! I would have NEVER guessed to look in the online help. BRILLIANT!!! Z!re, how exac...
- Thu Aug 24, 2006 4:18 pm
- Forum: QBASIC and QB64 Questions & Answers
- Topic: Pointers, PEEKing, and POKEing
- Replies: 5
- Views: 10245
Pointers, PEEKing, and POKEing
Is there a way to make pointer variables in QBASIC? That would be handy for a GUI...
Also, can someone give me a quick overview of the pro's and con's of PEEK and POKE?
Gracias.
Also, can someone give me a quick overview of the pro's and con's of PEEK and POKE?
Gracias.
- Wed Aug 23, 2006 3:55 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: New hardware...
- Replies: 15
- Views: 36224
- Mon Aug 21, 2006 4:30 pm
- Forum: General Discussion
- Topic: New hardware...
- Replies: 15
- Views: 36224
P.S. DOSBox is not an Emulator unless you're running on AMD processors. It is a Virtual Machine if you're using an Intel processor. Huh? DOSBox is a DOS-emulator ... DOSBox also emulates CPU:286/386 ... DOSBox is an emulator, regardless of who made your CPU. An emulator is only an emulator if it is...