
Or taking ideas from your source to make my put routine better.
~Dave~
Crippled version?Plasma wrote:Err...
First of all, I find it ironic that you ask for credit when you've got a crippled version of SetVideoSeg in there with no mention of the original author. And secondly, you're still only poking one byte at a time.
SuperPut is definitely faster. Now I suppose we'll get into a debate about what constitutes "pure QB"...
Umm, you did? And I tried to pull of some "OMG Pure QB wooo!111" crap?Z!re wrote:Nemesis, I said it last time you tried to pull off some "OMG Pure QB wooo!111" crap..
Noone care.. Pure QB is stupid, it's slow, and in some way trying to hold it as something special is absurd..
Also, your routine is way too bloated, personally, I'd never use it..
Maybe I'm confusing you with some other random person who wanted to make a fast pure QB put routine.. and failed.. (well, actually it worked, after creating half a meg worth of crap on the hdNemesis wrote:Umm, you did? And I tried to pull of some "OMG Pure QB wooo!111" crap?Z!re wrote:Nemesis, I said it last time you tried to pull off some "OMG Pure QB wooo!111" crap..
Noone care.. Pure QB is stupid, it's slow, and in some way trying to hold it as something special is absurd..
Also, your routine is way too bloated, personally, I'd never use it..
I Don't recall this moment
Jesus...you just don't get it! So let me explain... some people who only understand and comprehend QB might like a routine they fully understand that has special elements like speed, and less memory requirements. The reason for this might be, perhaps they can modify it or do whatever is needed with it to work into one of their projects.
So even better, faster, non-bloated, more efficient, blah, blah, blah... routine in another language might not be suitable to modify and work into their own projects, simply because they don't know what's going on.
(I'm suprised this thought never occured to you)
So I conclude... Pure QB is not stupid for some reasons as I pointed out, and non-pure QB would actually be stupid for some reasons, again as I pointed out.
P.s...
Z!re, looks to me like you do alot of talking about things that aren't true,
and never actually occured. My advice to you is to try not to make this type of thing a habit
Laters,
Nemesis
I enjoy pure QB programs. There great fun in the challenge department. I admit I'm unlikly to start a new project from scratch in QB anytime soon, but I do have a few I'm still finishing off, and I want to port one of my FB ones back to QB45... and maybe even QB1.1 (where routines like this would be useful) for the hell of it.Noone care.. Pure QB is stupid, it's slow, and in some way trying to hold it as something special is absurd..
Code: Select all
PUT