Various websites including this one: https://www.heise.de/netze/rfc/rfcs/rfc815.shtml have an RFC815 that state that making large "holes" and filling them in is the way to go and if they were all filled in then a packet is said to be received.
This is my Qbasic code but it isn't quite finished because I don't understand the algorithm perfectly the way its written in the RFC. Maybe someone with Qbasic and networking experience can shed some light.
Here's my code:
Am I beating around the bush with the way I written my code?
Code: Select all
DECLARE FUNCTION getfrag$ () DECLARE SUB setfrag (d$, ofs%, mf%) DECLARE SUB firsthole () DECLARE SUB addhole (first%, last%) 'Hole descriptors TYPE hd first AS INTEGER last AS INTEGER set AS INTEGER 'If non-zero, it means this index has an entry END TYPE TYPE d first AS INTEGER last AS INTEGER more AS INTEGER dat AS STRING * 4000 'data in our fragment END TYPE CONST maxhole = 1000 'Assume we deal with 1000 holes? DIM SHARED bigbuf AS STRING * 4000 'Our space of data after defragmentation is complete DIM SHARED hole(maxhole) AS hd, frag AS d 'highest index in hole descriptor 'increments when new entries are added DIM SHARED nhs% nhs% = 0 CALL firsthole 'our fragment (will need more of these eventually) CALL setfrag("TEST", 0, 1) 'run through each hole (this kills efficiency I think...) FOR hs% = 0 TO maxhole - 1 IF hole(hs%).set <> 0 THEN 'dont go through a hole if its not setup as a hole hf% = hole(hs%).first hl% = hole(hs%).last IF frag.first <= hl% AND frag.last >= hf% THEN 'This satisfies steps 2 and 3 of the algorithm hole(hs%).set = 0 'This satisfies step 4 mf = frag.more IF frag.first > hf% THEN CALL addhole(hf%, frag.first - 1) 'This satisfies step 5 IF frag.last < hl% AND mf% = 1 THEN CALL addhole(frag.last + 1, hl%) 'This satisfies step 6 hs% = -1 'redo count END IF END IF NEXT 'All hole descriptors are processed so we jam in the data I guess?? MID$(bigbuf, frag.first + 1, frag.last - frag.first) = getfrag$ 'then what??? END 'Here we add a hole to the new index and set it as a hole SUB addhole (first%, last%) nhs% = nhs% + 1 hole(nhs%).set = 1 hole(nhs%).first = first% hole(nhs%).last = last% END SUB 'We setup the first hole per algorithm as 0 to length of output data space SUB firsthole 'first hole = all space hole(0).first = 0 hole(0).last = LEN(bigbuf) hole(0).set = 1 END SUB 'We load our fragment FUNCTION getfrag$ getfrag$ = LEFT$(frag.dat, frag.last - frag.first) END FUNCTION 'We setup our fragment. 2nd parameter is offset of fragment the "remote" host reports it to be. '3rd parameter if non-zero means remote host has set the MF (more fragments) flag. SUB setfrag (d$, ofs%, mf%) frag.dat = d$ frag.first = ofs% frag.last = ofs% + LEN(d$) frag.more = 0 IF mf% <> 0 THEN frag.more = 1 END SUB
I want to receive the remote fragments but I don't want huge spaces in my output data if all the fragments come in an awkward order. (like say first fragment is offset 100, and second at offset 10 and third at offset 200 etc).